Defamation, Injurious Falsehood vs Misrepresentation
James regularly advises on defamation matters and can quickly appraise you of your prospects.
The virtual abolition of defamation relief for companies has forced many companies seeking defamation-style relief to make questionable claims in misrepresentation (s.52 TPA, Australian Consumer Law) and injurious falsehood. James specialises in striking out spurious claims.
James worked for three years in the Fairfax and Herald & Weekly Times newspapers, as a political press secretary on Premier Kennett’s private staff and an executive in Telstra’s Government Relations area giving him a rare insight into the main streams of media creation, interpretation and manipulation.
He completed a Graduate Diploma in Communications Law with Melbourne University’s School of Media Law before reading with regular defamation Counsel, Richard McGarvie SC.
SOCIAL MEDIA ATTACK!
Lightening-fast attacks on your business are a significant threat. In the space of 24 hours, the viral characteristics of Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and Google Reviews might have delivered a conclusive judgement against your goods and services that collapses your revenue.
The organisations that run these social media sites are largely contemptuous of the damage dishonest and malevolent manipulation of their platforms can wreak and offer no effective support against an organized hit job that can be arranged using freelancers working for next to no money in countries such as Bangladesh, India and Indonesia.
James specializes in injurious falsehood injunctions that communicate to the Court the seriousness of this new threat. If you are serious about acting quickly, he knows the speed with which a lawyer must move in the circumstances.
James has active matters in the County and Supreme Courts regarding defamation using Facebook and Google Reviews and regularly advises on the same.
Callan v Chawk [2023] FCA 898 posts on internet review site held not to merit qualified privilege
Pinksier v Carr S ECI 2020 04651 (junior to Marcus Clarke QC
Tingo Education Australia ty Ltd v Herald Sun CI – 21 - 005
Crime Stoppers: Page sued by bodybuilder George Agrofylakos over ‘incorrect’ post | Herald Sun
Lorbek & Lorbek v King No S CI 2017 04600 – Supreme Court of Victoria defamatory Google Reviews using multiple false names – (ongoing trial in October)
Dr John Sader v Dr Paul Mulvaney S ECI 2020 02597 Supreme Court of Victoria – defamatory use of research meetings (ongoing)
Cvek & Anor v Mihailescu & Ors [2019] VSC 679 (11 October 2019)
Brott v PKF Melbourne Pty Ltd & ors SC I 2016 02001 This matter was resolved before trial.
Seven Network (Operations) Limited v Amber Harrison [2017] NSWSC 129 (22 February 2017) an injunction brought by Channel 7 to gag Amber Harrison from criticizing her previous employer. James appeared for Ms Harrison. Considerable media interest in this matter.
COURTS AND JUDICIAL SYSTEM – cross-vesting – James successfully applied to force a similar proceeding in the Federal Court to merge with a state defamation proceeding in Victoria.
Price v Crikey Media Pty Ltd & Anor [2001] VSC 392 (4 October 2001).
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Contempt of Court - Publications by litigants tending to interfere with the due administration of justice.
In addition to regular advice work, he was Counsel in the Contempt and defamation defences of Stephen Mayne’s Crikey website when allegations were brought against it by Stephen Price then of 3AW. Recently he obtained an award of $103,000.00 for a Bangladeshi Australian falsely accused of murder (Mohamed Awal v Mohamed Rouf [2004] VSC, 21 July 2004, unreported, Stott J; click here for newspaper article).
James regularly advises bloggers on potential defamation liability. James has appeared as junior to Clive Evatt QC in a defamation jury trial in the NSW Supreme Court and in March 2010 conducted a 9-day defamation jury trial in the County Court of Victoria: Vo v Nguyen. He has a good knowledge of the technical interlocutory steps in defamation proceedings. Rahim v Channel 7: and here.
See also: Holbrook v McPhee an internet defamation case involving a US client –
Holbrook and Orphancare International Inc v McPhee [2011] VCC 501 (12 April 2011)
Other matters include Mahon v Carter, a defamation and injurious falsehood proceeding in the NSW Supreme Court, acting for the defendant, and in the Federal Court in South Australia, Astra Resources PLC v Wikifrauds SAD 239 of 2012, both times acting for a public interest website dedicated to exposing commercial fraud. In Astra James also acted for the Defendant.
In Mahon, after the systematic attack on the Plaintiff’s pleadings, the NSWSC struck out the claim and awarded costs against the Plaintiff: Mahon v Mach 1 Financial Services Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 10 see the case here. In Astra, the case was settled on confidential terms after a similar systematic attack on the pleadings. The terms of the resolution of the Astra Resources proceeding are confidential.
